SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2025
Anti-IL5/IL-5 receptor therapies for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis: an updated Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eosinophilia and the Heart: Evolving Concepts.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- [Research advances on the role of eosinophils in acute liver injury].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- EGPA at Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Single-Center Profile of Laboratory Findings and Clinical Evidence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Eosinophil Extracellular Traps in Health and Disease: From Host Defense to Chronic Inflammation.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- The Use of Biological Therapies in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: Current State of Knowledge.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Targeting Type 2 and Non-type 2 Asthma: Emerging Biologics and Personalized Strategies.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (EGPA) is a rare necrotizing vasculitis characterized by eosinophilic inflammation that was traditionally treated with corticosteroids associated with other immunosuppressants. Over the last years different biological therapies targeting IL-5/IL-5 receptor have become available and have been employed to tackle this challenging condition. Aim of the present study is to synthesis the evidence on the clinical presentation of this disease and on the efficacy of the newly available therapeutic strategies. Methods: In June 2024 PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library were searched for studies reporting on EGPA patients being treated by means of different anti IL-5 or anti eosinophils biological therapies. Risk of bias was assessed through the ROBINS-I and RoB2 tools according to study design. Proportion meta-analysis was employed to synthetize data on EGPA clinical manifestations, while data on treatment outcomes was analyzed descriptively due to the high heterogeneity. Results: The present systematic review included 25 studies on a total of 1131 patients. Asthma was present in 99.2% of the patients, Sinonasal involvement in 87.0% and ANCA positivity in 22.8%. The explored treatments consisted in Benralizumab 30 mg every 4 weeks, Mepolizumab 100 mg or 300 mg every 4 weeks and Reslizumab 3mg/Kg every 4 weeks. All the anti-IL-5/IL-5 receptor molecules proved efficacious in remission control and corticosteroid tapering. Conclusion: The available data strongly suggests integrating anti IL-5/IL-5 receptor therapies into EGPA treatment strategies, to enhance patients' outcomes and reduce the long term side effects of prolonged corticosteroid therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.