ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Five autoantibodies identified from immune complexes as breast cancer biomarkers.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumor antigen-associated autoantibodies: generation mechanisms, roles in tumorigenesis and progression, and clinical application prospects.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based insights into circulating autoantibody dynamics and treatment outcomes in patients with NSCLC receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Comprehensive identification and profiling of antigens in serum immune complexes (ICs) is crucial for developing early diagnostic biomarkers for cancer. We therefore undertook this study to identify novel IC-derived autoantigens and autoantibodies in patients with breast cancer, and to evaluate their potential as new biomarkers. Methods: ICs were purified from serum with C1q and Protein A/G affinity capture. The isolated complexes were digested with papain and analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Twelve candidate autoantibodies revealed by LC-MS/MS were first verified with a digital liquid chip method (DLCM) in baseline serum from 40 breast cancer patients and eight healthy controls. Five autoantibodies were then validated in independent cohorts of 33 breast cancer patients and 45 healthy controls, using DLCM. Results: Autoantibodies targeting PF4, PSMB3, PRPF19, RTCB, SDHA, ENO1, PTBP2, PRDX6, ANP32A, VDAC1, MMP14 and HSPA4 were identified both purification methods. In the verification cohort, IgG autoantibodies against HSPA4, ENO1, PRDX6, PRPF19 and MMP14 were significantly increased in breast cancer patients with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.90, 0.89, 0.82, 0.78 and 0.77, respectively. Their combined panel discriminated breast cancer from controls with an AUC of 0.97. In the validation cohort, the same autoantibodies achieved AUCs of 0.79, 0.81, 0.73, 0.87, and 0.82, and the combination of these five autoantibodies yielded an AUC of 0.88. Conclusions: The autoantibodies identified from ICs can serve as effective serum biomarkers for breast cancer. Anti-HSPA4, anti-PRPF19, anti-ENO1, anti-PRDX6, and anti-MMP14 autoantibodies showed significant increases in breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.