ArticleResearch square2025
A Stakeholder-Engaged Process to Design and Implement the Assessment of Cognitive Complaints Toolkit for Alzheimer's Disease (ACCT-AD) in Primary Care.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Dementia is underdiagnosed, particularly in primary care settings where most people receive their healthcare. These is a need for tools to assist with the diagnosis of dementia by primary care clinicians, who greatly outnumber specialists. Objective: To describe the collaborative design process, implementation, and lessons learned when developing a new cognitive assessment tool for primary care settings. Design and Participants: We used an iterative approach to develop, test, and revise the Assessment of Cognitive Complaints Toolkit for Alzheimer's Disease (ACCT-AD), and used qualitative and survey-based methods to identify lessons learned from its use in four community primary care practices in California. Key Results: Lessons learned from implementing the ACCT-AD toolkit in community primary care practices include the importance of stakeholder engagement in the process, assessing and adapting workflow, staffing, and approach; the educational value of the toolkit as a systematic tool, user response to the toolkit, and challenges around workflow, integration, and sustainability. Conclusions: The design and implementation of the ACCT-AD toolkit explicitly target workforce constraints that will continue to emerge as demand for cognitive assessment increases. Our approach, which enables primary care clinicians to complete a thorough assessment within their practice, supports building on the strong foundation of the doctor-patient relationship in primary care, and can lead to earlier diagnosis and more efficient referrals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.