ArticleFrontiers in systems biology2025
Learning Gaussian Graphical Models from Correlated Data.
Article in Frontiers in systems biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Metabolite signatures of chronological age, aging, survival, and longevity.Cell reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gaussian Graphical Models (GGMs) are a type of network modeling that uses partial correlation rather than correlation for representing complex relationships among multiple variables. The advantage of using partial correlation is to show the relation between two variables after "adjusting" for the effects of other variables and leads to more parsimonious and interpretable models. There are well established procedures to build GGMs from a sample of independent and identical distributed observations. However, many studies include clustered and longitudinal data that result in correlated observations and ignoring this correlation among observations can lead to inflated Type I error. In this paper, we propose a cluster-based bootstrap algorithm to infer GGMs from correlated data. We use extensive simulations of correlated data from family-based studies to show that the proposed bootstrap method does not inflate the Type I error while retaining statistical power compared to alternative solutions when there are sufficient number of clusters. We apply our method to learn the GGM that represents complex relations between 47 Polygenic Risk Scores generated using genome-wide genotype data from the Long Life Family Study. By comparing it to the conventional methods that ignore within-cluster correlation, we show that our method controls the Type I error well without power loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.