Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40766210›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems biology2025

Learning Gaussian Graphical Models from Correlated Data.

Zeyuan Song, Sophia Gunn, Stefano Monti, Gina Marie Peloso, Ching-Ti Liu, Kathryn Lunetta, Paola Sebastiani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zeyuan SongInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Sophia GunnThe New York Genome Center, New York, NY, USA.
Stefano MontiSection of Computational Biomedicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Gina Marie PelosoDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Ching-Ti LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Kathryn LunettaDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Paola SebastianiInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

The Long Life Family StudyU19AG063893 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Stacy Andersen, KAARE CHRISTENSEN · 2019 to 2026
$125.4M
Systems BiologyU19AG023122 · NIA · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI NICHOLAS Joseph SCHORK · 2004 to 2026
$102.6M
Identifying protective omics profiles in centenarians and translating these into preventive and therapeutic strategiesUH3AG064704 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI PERLS, THOMAS T, SEBASTIANI, PAOLA · 2022 to 2025
$14.7M
Identifying protective omics profiles in centenarians and translating these into preventive and therapeutic strategiesUH2AG064704 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI PERLS, THOMAS T, SEBASTIANI, PAOLA · 2019 to 2021
$9.4M
Integrative Omics to enhance therapeutics development for healthy agingUH3AG064706 · NIA · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI MILLER, RICHARD A, SCHORK, NICHOLAS JOSEPH · 2021 to 2024
$3.3M
Protein Signatures of APOE2 and Cognitive AgingR01AG061844 · NIA · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI PERLS, THOMAS T, SEBASTIANI, PAOLA · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG061844NIA NIH HHS U19 AG023122NIA NIH HHS U19 AG063893NIA NIH HHS UH2 AG064704NIA NIH HHS UH3 AG064704NIA NIH HHS UH3 AG064706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gaussian Graphical Models (GGMs) are a type of network modeling that uses partial correlation rather than correlation for representing complex relationships among multiple variables. The advantage of using partial correlation is to show the relation between two variables after "adjusting" for the effects of other variables and leads to more parsimonious and interpretable models. There are well established procedures to build GGMs from a sample of independent and identical distributed observations. However, many studies include clustered and longitudinal data that result in correlated observations and ignoring this correlation among observations can lead to inflated Type I error. In this paper, we propose a cluster-based bootstrap algorithm to infer GGMs from correlated data. We use extensive simulations of correlated data from family-based studies to show that the proposed bootstrap method does not inflate the Type I error while retaining statistical power compared to alternative solutions when there are sufficient number of clusters. We apply our method to learn the GGM that represents complex relations between 47 Polygenic Risk Scores generated using genome-wide genotype data from the Long Life Family Study. By comparing it to the conventional methods that ignore within-cluster correlation, we show that our method controls the Type I error well without power loss.

Indexed as

BootstrapCorelated DataGaussian Graphical ModelsPolygenic Risk Score

Identifiers

PMID40766210
PMCPMC12323441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.