Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40766194›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of heart failure2025

Impact of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation on Hemodynamics and Cardiac Mechanics: Insights From Pressure-Volume Loop Analysis.

Masahiro Otake, Hidetaka Morita, Kei Sato, Keita Saku

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. New Insights into Cardiac Intensive Care.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Masahiro OtakeDepartment of Cardiovascular Dynamics, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4938-3738
Hidetaka MoritaDepartment of Cardiovascular Dynamics, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0467-9236
Kei SatoDepartment of Cardiovascular Dynamics, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3338-1984
Keita SakuDepartment of Cardiovascular Dynamics, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6856-9362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) serves as a critical mechanical circulatory support modality, sustaining systemic circulation in cases of severe cardiac failure or cardiac arrest. While VA-ECMO improves hemodynamics, it markedly increases left ventricular (LV) afterload, contributing to pulmonary congestion and thrombus formation. This review highlights the hemodynamic and mechanical effects of VA-ECMO, employing the pressure-volume (PV) loop and the generalized circulatory equilibrium model. The PV loop framework clarifies how VA-ECMO elevates afterload, potentially reducing stroke volume and the cardiac output curve when LV contractility is severely impaired. Similarly, the generalized circulatory equilibrium concept illustrates how VA-ECMO shifts the circulatory equilibrium point in both ventricles. These models establish a mechanistic foundation for strategies combining VA-ECMO with other devices, such as an intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, or central VA-ECMO equipped with LV venting. Based on these frameworks, appropriate patient selection, effective device management, and integration with LV unloading devices may enhance survival in patients requiring VA-ECMO.

Indexed as

Heart failureHemodynamicsIn silico modelingPhysiologyVenoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Identifiers

PMID40766194
PMCPMC12318849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.