ReviewInternational journal of heart failure2025
Establishing a National Quality of Care Framework for Heart Failure in Korea: Keep Standards for Heart Failure (KSHF) Initiative.
Review in International journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of an Intervention to Improve Guideline-Directed Medications for Patients With Acute Heart Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Trial
- Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis in Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges-A Case Report.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Korean Society of Heart Failure Guidelines for the Palliative Care and Hospice for Heart Failure Patients.International journal of heart failure · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) continues to pose a significant public health burden in Korea, marked by increasing prevalence, hospitalizations, and healthcare costs. Although advances in guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) have improved patient prognosis, a persistent gap between evidence-based guidelines and real-world practice hinders optimal patient outcomes. To address this challenge, the Korean Society of Heart Failure launched the Keep Standards for Heart Failure (KSHF) initiative to enhance the quality of care (QoC) for individuals with HF. This initiative combines registry-based and non-registry approaches, including the development of structured educational programs, a standardized discharge checklist, and the implementation of the KSHF-QoC registry. The registry is designed to systematically evaluate HF management across diverse healthcare settings by analyzing prescription trends, treatment adherence, and patient-centered outcomes. Unlike earlier registries that focused primarily on acute HF in tertiary care centers managed by HF specialists, the KSHF-QoC registry broadens its scope to include general cardiologists, thereby offering a more comprehensive and representative assessment of routine care. Through continuous monitoring of QoC indicators, benchmarking across institutions, and structured performance feedback, the KSHF initiative aims to improve GDMT adherence, optimize HF care delivery, and reduce readmission rates. These efforts represent a critical advancement toward standardizing HF management and improving long-term outcomes for patients in Korea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.