ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
Lifespan brain age prediction based on multiple EEG oscillatory features and sparse group lasso.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Back to the Future of qEEG: Lifespan Normative Modeling of Spectral Ratios and Functional Indices with Potential Applications to Therapeutic Monitoring.Brain topography · 2026Article
- Dyadic Neural Synchronization: Differences between Offline and Computer-assisted Online Verbal Interaction.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Mapping EEG Metrics to Human Affective and Cognitive Models: An Interdisciplinary Scoping Review from a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The neural dynamics underlying cognition and behavior change greatly during the lifespan of brain development and aging. EEG is a promising modality due to its high temporal resolution in capturing neural oscillations. Precise prediction of brain age (BA) based on EEG is crucial to screening high-risk individuals from large cohorts. However, the lifespan representation of the EEG oscillatory features (OSFs) is largely unclear, limiting practical BA applications in clinical scenarios. This study aims to build an interpretable BA prediction model through prior knowledge and sparse group lasso. Methods: Based on the multinational cross-spectral (MNCS) dataset that covers 5-97 years, (1) we extracted four groups of OSFs, such as aperiodic parameters, periodic parameters, power-ratio, and relative power; (2) the OSFs trajectories evolving with age and the OSF importance topographies were mapped using the generalized additive model for location, scale and shape (GAMLSS) and Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC); (3) the inter-oscillatory dependency coefficients (ODCs) were extracted by the sparse group lasso; (4) the fusion of OSFs and ODCs was flattened and fed into a three-layer fully connected neural network (FCNN); the FCNN interpretability was analyzed by Layerwise Relevance Propagation and 10-fold cross-validation. Results: The results showed that the FCNN model that incorporated ODC significantly improved the prediction of BA (MAE = 2.95 years, Discussion: In general, this study proposed a BA prediction model named NEOBA by systematically employing OSFs and highlighting the interpretability of the model, which holds broad promise by integrating normative modeling for precise individual stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.