ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Toward Digital Twins in the Intensive Care Unit: A Medication Management Case Study.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of digital twins developed using a large language model (LLaMA-3), fine-tuned with Low-Rank Adapters (LoRA) on ICU physician notes, and to determine whether specialty-specific training enhances treatment recommendation accuracy compared to other ICU specialties or zero-shot baselines. Materials and Methods: Digital twins were created using LLaMA-3 fine-tuned on discharge summaries from the MIMIC-III dataset, where medications were masked to construct training and testing datasets. The medical ICU dataset (1,000 notes) was used for evaluation, and performance was assessed using BERTScore and ROUGE-L. A zero-shot baseline model, relying solely on contextual instructions without training, was also evaluated. While our approach moves toward digital twin capabilities, it does not incorporate real-time, patient-specific EHR data and can be viewed as an ICU specialty-level language model adaptation. Results: Models fine-tuned on medical ICU notes achieved the highest BERTScore (0.842), outperforming models trained on other specialties or mixed datasets. Zero-shot models showed the lowest performance, highlighting the importance of training. Discussion: The findings demonstrate that specialty-specific training significantly improves treatment recommendation accuracy in digital twins compared to generalized or zero-shot approaches. Tailoring models to specific ICU domains strengthens their clinical decision-support capabilities. Conclusion: Context-specific fine-tuning of large language models is crucial for developing effective digital twins, offering foundational insights for personalized clinical decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.