Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40766101›Full record

ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025

Patient and Surgeon-Reported Satisfaction With Reconstruction Following Superficial Parotidectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jacob S Brady, G Nina Lu, Peter M Vila, Zain H Rizvi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jacob S BradyDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA.
G Nina LuDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Washington Seattle Washington USA.
Peter M VilaVila Institute for Plastic Surgery Portland Oregon USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3639-2432
Zain H RizviDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Washington Seattle Washington USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2070-2005

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: (1) Assess current methods for the collection of patient- and surgeon-reported outcomes after superficial parotidectomy reconstruction. (2) Determine which post-parotidectomy reconstructive method provides the highest degree of patient satisfaction. Methods: PRISMA guidelines were followed for article identification and selection. A total of 17 peer-reviewed articles including 898 patients were included in the study. Outcome data was mathematically harmonized across studies to allow statistical analysis. Random effects meta-analysis of proportions was performed. The Freeman-Tukey Double Arcsine method was used to calculate the pooled estimate, or rate for each analyzed outcome. Results: No standardized or previously validated instrument was used to collect patient satisfaction data following superficial parotidectomy reconstruction in any of the included studies. After data harmonization, overall patient satisfaction was 93% when no reconstruction was performed, compared to 97% for sternocleidomastoid flap (SCM), and 100% for superficial muscular aponeurotic system flap (SMAS). Patient satisfaction of symmetry was 41% when no reconstruction was performed, compared to 65% for SMAS, 95% for free fat graft, and 96% for SCM. Conclusions: Reporting methods for patient satisfaction with appearance and symmetry after superficial parotidectomy and reconstruction are heterogeneous and non-standardized. Artificially harmonized data demonstrate that patient-reported outcomes of satisfaction and symmetry were improved following any form of reconstruction after parotidectomy, and patients reported symmetry-specific satisfaction was less when SMAS reconstruction was performed. Validated and objective instruments should be utilized to determine the optimal approach to facial reconstruction after superficial parotidectomy to maximize patient-centered outcomes.

Indexed as

parotidectomypatient‐reported outcomesreconstructionsurgeon‐reported outcomessystematic review and meta‐analysis

Identifiers

PMID40766101
PMCPMC12322585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.