Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40766074›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Analysis of risk factors and intervention measures for postoperative bleeding in patients with diabetes after proctologic surgery based on a logistic regression model.

Qiuxiang Yu, Peiyao Li, Dan Li, Lin Wang, Guoshuang Yu, Rui Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qiuxiang Yu *Department of Proctology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peiyao Li *Department of International Coloproctology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Dan LiDepartment of International Coloproctology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lin WangDepartment of International Coloproctology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Guoshuang YuDepartment of International Coloproctology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Rui LiDepartment of International Ward 3, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyse the risk factors for bleeding after proctologic surgery, provide a reference for clinical management and improve postoperative recovery in patients. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients undergoing proctologic surgery in our hospital. Patients with postoperative bleeding comprised the study group, whereas those without bleeding formed the control group. A logistic regression model was used to analyse the risk factors for postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing proctologic surgery. A Results: The study found that the risk of postoperative bleeding in men was significantly higher than in women ( Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the risk of postoperative bleeding after proctologic surgery was closely associated with several factors, including male sex, hypertension, preoperative antibiotic use and postoperative constipation, all of which significantly increased the risk of bleeding.

Indexed as

diabetespostoperative hemorrhageproctologic operationproctologic surgeryrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40766074
PMCPMC12321801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.