ArticleClinical & translational immunology2025
Elucidating novel immune profiles for predicting infection in high-risk cohorts: a pilot study in patients with relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
Article in Clinical & translational immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) patients are at increased risk for infection, with the risk even higher for relapsed and refractory patients. Clinical assessment of infection risk is increasingly challenging in the era of immune-based therapies, such as Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors. A pilot study was conducted to elucidate possible predictive immune markers. Methods: Patients with relapsed and refractory CLL treated with ibrutinib were evaluated. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected at defined intervals (baseline, 3- and 6 months following commencement of ibrutinib) were analysed, with or without phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)/ionomycin stimulation, using Luminex and RNA sequencing. Luminex and gene expression profiles were compared between patients that who did and did not develop infection to identify immune signatures associated with infection over a subsequent 3-month period. Results: Twenty-eight patients were included in this pilot study. Forty-six per cent of patients developed an infection (13 patients, 17 events) over 9 months of patient monitoring. Most infections were clinically diagnosed (72.7%) with the remainder microbiologically diagnosed bacterial (18.1%) and viral (9.2%) infections. Cell populations did not correlate with subsequent infection. An inflammatory transcriptome profile at 3 months following ibrutinib was associated with a subsequent infection episode. Increased whole protein response to PMA stimulation at 3 and 6 months was associated with subsequent risk for infections. Increased whole protein response to PMA stimulation was associated with subsequent risk of infection 3 months after commencing ibrutinib. Conclusion: The combination of protein and RNA analysis can provide further insight into the interactions of immunotherapies and immunity but should be validated further in large cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.