Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40766012›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025

Freedom and mental health: an overview of the impact of fundamental rights on psychological wellbeing.

Changiz Mohiyeddini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Changiz MohiyeddiniDepartment of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freedom, in its many forms, is a cornerstone of human rights. These include, among others, freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of assembly, and freedom from discrimination. However, these freedoms are not only legal or political constructs but are also deeply embedded in the socio-cultural, religious, political, historical, and hence psychological composition of human beings. Rather than examining all of the many manifestations of freedom at once, this paper aims to explore the impact of a few specific freedoms-including freedom of speech, thought, assembly, movement, and protection from arbitrary arrest-on mental health and wellbeing. The objective of this commentary is to summarize existing evidence on how these freedoms support mental health and to highlight areas where the restriction of freedoms is linked to psychological distress, including anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Furthermore, it also discusses the debilitating effects of self-censorship, discrimination, lack of access to education, and arbitrary detention on mental health. Despite substantial evidence underscoring the importance of freedoms for mental wellbeing, there remains a pressing need for comprehensive research to understand the complex associations between different aspects of freedom and their individual and collective impact on mental health. The discussion herein aims to provide a foundation for future studies and to inform policy interventions that protect both freedom and psychological wellbeing.

Indexed as

autonomydiscriminationfreedomfreedom of speechhuman rightsmental healthpsychological wellnesssocial support

Identifiers

PMID40766012
PMCPMC12321794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.