ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Interhemispheric interactions in visual word recognition: the role of multiple meanings.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of syllabic constraints on error production in Korean speech: a study of serial order control with practice.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The current study investigated the influence of the number of meanings on visual word recognition, with a particular focus on hemispheric dynamics. Methods: By reanalyzing parafoveal Korean lexical decision data, we examined how words with a high versus low number of meanings affect right visual field advantage (RVFA) and bilateral redundancy gain (BRG). Results: The words with a greater number of meanings exhibited a stronger RVFA and reduced BRG compared to words with fewer meanings. Discussion: The findings suggest that the facilitatory effects associated with multiple meanings are more pronounced in the left hemisphere (LH) than in the right hemisphere (RH). Furthermore, the increased lateralization of processing within the LH appears to diminish the need for interhemispheric interactions, leading to decreased coordination between the hemispheres. These results imply that the number of meanings in words shapes interhemispheric dynamics during visual word recognition. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to theoretical models of visual word recognition and hemispheric differences in language processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.