ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025
Quantitative Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Characteristics Across Age Groups.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative Analysis of Age-Related Changes in the Lower Face.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Quantitative Assessment of Polydioxanone Microsphere Fillers for Nasolabial Fold Correction: A Comparative Study.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The understanding of nasolabial fold (NLF) change with aging is essential for facial rejuvenation. Objectives: The aim of the authors of the study is to develop an objective method measuring the severity of NLFs and to evaluate the age-related characteristics of the NLF through quantitative parameters. Methods: A total of 150 healthy participants (ages 21-70) were divided into 5 age groups. Ten NLF features were measured: length, NLF-fold area, maximum width, maximum color depth, area Results: Significant increases in NLF length, width, fold area, and color depth were observed between the twenties and the thirties. Upper NLF features showed changes starting in the thirties, with gradual increases until the fifties, plateauing by 70. Lower NLF changes began in the thirties, peaked in the fifties to sixties, and leveled off thereafter. Males exhibited a more rapid increase in volume-related NLF features between 35 and 40 years, surpassing females in this regard. Males also had greater color depth between 35 and 40 years, whereas females predominated after age 56. Several NLF features demonstrated superior predictive value for age compared with the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale. Conclusions: Upper NLF changes begin in the thirties and continue through the fifties, whereas lower NLF changes peak from the forties to sixties. Gender differences were observed, with males showing earlier changes. These findings provide a reliable, objective method for assessing mid-facial aging in clinical practice. Level of Evidence 3 Therapeutic:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.