Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40765989›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025

Estimating the impact of prenatal health care services on adverse pregnancy outcomes in Tanzania: a propensity score matching approach.

Magashi Joseph Ntegwa, Riccardo Pelizzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Magashi Joseph NtegwaGraduate School of Public Policy, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Riccardo PelizzoGraduate School of Public Policy, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes remains one of the public issues that needs to be addressed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Tanzania. Despite evidence on the effectiveness of antenatal care (ANC) services in addressing adverse pregnancy outcomes, empirical studies are scarce. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the impact of ANC services on adverse pregnancy outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective study that uses secondary data from the Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey for 2022. The impact of ANC services on adverse pregnancy outcomes was estimated using Propensity Score Matching (PSM), and the robustness of results was checked using doubly robust estimators. Results: Adequate ANC services utilization reduces adverse pregnancy outcomes in Tanzania. Specifically, adequate ANC services utilization reduces adverse pregnancy outcomes: 5.6%-8.2% (depending on the PSM approach used). Similarly, an adequate ANC package reduces adverse pregnancy outcomes: 6.3%-9.3% (depending on the PSM approach used). Conclusions: The prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes needs to be addressed through adherence to ANC services utilization. Despite the utilization of ANC services being influenced by social, economic, and demographic factors, it is important to ensure essential packages of services are delivered to a pregnant woman for better pregnancy outcomes, as our results show that ANC visits alone have no significant impact.

Indexed as

adverse pregnancyantenatal caredemographic and health surveymiscarriagepropensity score matchingstillbirthsTanzania

Identifiers

PMID40765989
PMCPMC12321850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.