Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40765987›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025

Na we go shine: women's wellbeing, agency, and health seeking behaviours in southeastern Nigeria.

Farah M C Shroff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Farah M C ShroffDepartment of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Peer-reviewed literature on southeastern Nigerian women's health status is scant. This participatory action research project explored mental and physical health status issues within a sample population of childbearing women in Cross River State. Methods: We conducted an initial study using the formal chieftaincy channels in villages and learned that those who expressed themselves were primarily men. We found that their concerns differed from those of women. We conducted this study in an attempt to hear from women about their health needs in the context of their lives. Local women carried out face-to-face interviews in their language with childbearing women in their community. We interviewed 70 women from ages 18-45 in 12 villages. Results/discussion: Most participants had their own farms and grew rice, cassava and yam to feed their families. The majority of participants had not completed elementary school and had given birth to an average of 6 children, 4 of whom survived. Most of the women who were included in this study walked 6-8 h per day to retrieve drinking water. Their young children and babies often accompanied their mothers on these journeys. Participants reported that they had suffered from malaria, diarrhea, anemia, hernia, waist pains, cough, eye problems and continuous headaches. Traditional healers were their first choice for treatment, partly because of physical and financial accessibility and partly because of cultural resonance and positive outcomes. Conclusion: Despite tremendous social, economic and political barriers, our participants generally reported a strong sense of well-being and had positive outlooks on their lives. We also interviewed 15 traditional healers to enhance the statements made by our female participants regarding their health-seeking behaviors.

Indexed as

Nigeriaruraltraditional medicinewomen's healthwork culture

Identifiers

PMID40765987
PMCPMC12321770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.