ArticleBlood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis2024
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of acquired hemophilia A before and after emicizumab approval in Japan.
Article in Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of emicizumab use in hospitalized older individuals with acquired hemophilia A.Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis · 2026Article
- Acquired hemophilia A: an illustrated review based on the French National Guidelines.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
- Clinical Experience with Emicizumab and Rituximab as First-Line Treatment in a Case Series of Acquired Hemophilia A.Hematology reports · 2026Article
- Emicizumab in the treatment of acquired hemophilia A: A Two-Center experience.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Pregnancy-Associated Acquired Hemophilia A (PA-AHA) Treated Successfully With the Factor-Mimetic Bispecific Antibody Emicizumab: A Case Report and Literature Review.Case reports in hematology · 2026Article
- Successful hemodialysis initiation in acquired hemophilia a managed with susoctocog alfa and emicizumab.CEN case reports · 2025Article
- Acquired Hemophilia-A Case Series and Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis in a Patient with Acquired Hemophilia A: A Case Report of Perioperative Hemostatic Management with Plasma Exchange.Surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Management of Breakthrough Bleeding During Emicizumab Prophylaxis in Acquired Haemophilia A: Data From the GTH-AHA-EMI Study.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of HemophiliaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare and potentially fatal bleeding disorder. Although bypassing agents effectively control active bleeding, their disadvantages, such as high cost and frequent administration, necessitate an agent that prevents recurrent bleeding events requiring bypassing agents. Emicizumab, a recombinant, humanized, bispecific monoclonal antibody with coagulation factor VIII (FVIII)-mimetic activity, was approved in Japan in 2022 for preventing bleeding in patients with AHA. However, owing to the rarity of the disease, real-world data on emicizumab use in AHA are scarce. Therefore, we aimed to assess the clinical characteristics and outcomes of 19 patients who were newly diagnosed with AHA before (non-emicizumab group [non-emi group], n = 12) and after (emicizumab group [emi group], n = 7) emicizumab approval in Japan. The median age, FVIII coagulation activity, and FVIII inhibitor titer were 81 vs 76 years, 1.0% vs 1.0%, and 43.75 vs 622 Bethesda units per mL in the non-emi and emi groups, respectively. Severe bleeding occurred in 14% of patients in the emi group, compared with 58% of patients in the non-emi group. Additionally, the doses of bypassing agents per patient were 43.4 vs 7, and the units of red blood cell transfusion per patient were 26.7 vs 4 in the non-emi and emi groups, respectively. Their hospital stays were median 73.5 days and 44 days, respectively. All patients treated with emicizumab maintained their activities of daily living (ADLs) and experienced no side effects. This study suggests that emicizumab effectively prevents bleeding in patients with AHA. Moreover, emicizumab may lead to shorter hospital stays, maintained ADLs, reduced costs, and improved prognosis in patients with AHA.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.