ArticleBlood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis2025
Real-world analysis of strategies to prevent thrombosis and bleeding in adults with ALL treated with asparaginase.
Article in Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk Assessment for Venous Thrombosis in Lymphoma and Emerging Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognosis of adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has improved with the incorporation of pediatric-inspired regimens that contain PEGylated asparaginase (PEG-Asp). However, PEG-Asp administration is associated with an increased rate of thrombosis. Data regarding the benefits of antithrombin (AT) repletion and prophylactic anticoagulation in adults receiving PEG-Asp-based regimens are limited. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the rates of induction thrombosis and bleeding among adults receiving ALL therapy containing Asp at 6 academic centers in the United States. Of 233 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 98.3% received PEG-Asp. Ninety-six patients (41.2%) had their AT levels monitored, 58 patients (24.9%) received AT repletion, and 41 patients (17.6%) received prophylactic anticoagulation. Thirty-two patients (13.7%) experienced thrombotic events, with half (53.1%) being line-associated thromboses. In multivariate analysis, the odds of thrombosis did not differ between patients who received AT monitoring, AT repletion, or prophylactic anticoagulation. The odds of thrombosis were 4 times higher for patients with peripherally inserted central catheters than for those with other types of central lines (odds ratio, 4.112; 95% confidence interval, 1.622-10.427;
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.