ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025
Legal challenges to the 340B drug pricing program: administration, regulation, and reform.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 340B Drug Pricing Program ("340B Program") was created to help safety net hospitals and clinics "stretch scarce federal resources" by discounting the price of their outpatient drug purchases. The spread between the discounted price and the sales price of the drug is retained by the hospitals and clinics, subsidizing operational costs and funding services that would not otherwise be possible to provide. The 340B Program has grown dramatically since its inception, eliciting significant criticism and calls for reform. Many legal challenges against the 340B Program and the agency tasked with administering the program-the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)-have been brought, highlighting the limitations in HRSA's powers. Specifically, HRSA's lack of broad regulatory authority has hampered its ability to oversee and reform the 340B Program. This article analyzes the litigation challenging the 340B Program-including cases regarding the orphan drug exclusion, the definition of a 340B patient, and the use of contract pharmacies-and explores the scope of HRSA's authority to regulate the 340B Program. In doing so, this article emphasizes the need for reforms to ensure that the 340B Program operates consistent with its congressional purpose and patients maintain access to safety net care across the country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.