ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2025
Durvalumab-combined chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer in a Japanese expert center: initial 50 cases in daily practice.
Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advanced intestinal-type ampullary cancer successfully treated using combination therapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab: A case report.SAGE open medical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Combination regimen consisting of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab (GCD) has been employed for unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC) since the end of 2022 in Japan. Here, we summarize our experience with GCD to demonstrate the clinical outcomes in a practical setting. Patients who underwent GCD for unresectable/recurrent BTC between January and December 2023 were investigated retrospectively. Data for maximal response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meyer method. Fifty (initially unresectable, n = 32; recurrence after surgery, n = 18) consecutive patients were enrolled, 19 of whom started GCD as second-line therapy or later. Overall RR was 24.0% including complete response in 1 (2%) patient and partial response in 11 (22%) patients; DCR was 68.0%. The median PFS and OS were 7.1 months and not reached, respectively. During a median follow-up period of 8.5 months, 8 (16%) patients underwent surgical resection. A total of 36 (72%) patients suffered Grade 3-5 AE, and 3 immune-related AE were controlled with injection of corticosteroid or observation. The efficacy of GCD for unresectable/recurrent BTC was confirmed in the practical setting, with acceptable toxicity, prolonged survival, and potential probability of resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.