ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2025
Reproducibility and validity of a food frequency questionnaire for nutrient intakes in the study areas of large-scale cohort studies in Japan.
Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A polymorphism in theNagoya journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Nutrient patterns and mortality: results from the Japan Multi-Institutional Collaborative Cohort (J-MICC) study.Nutrition journal · 2025Article
- Associations of vegetable and fruit consumption with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the Japanese population: the Japan multi-institutional collaborative cohort study.Nutrition journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Japan Multi-Institutional Collaborative Cohort Study, the Yamagata Molecular Epidemiological Cohort Study, and the Tsuruoka Metabolomics Cohort Study use a 47-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) developed in central Japan in 2004. We applied regression analyses to estimate nutrient intakes in the FFQ. The regression equations, however, may not be so robust and may vary among areas, even in Japan. We aimed to evaluate the reproducibility and validity of the FFQ over an expanded area of Japan. Healthy volunteers aged 34-70 years from 13 areas of Japan provided 12-day weighed dietary records (WDRs) and completed two FFQs over 1 year. We evaluated reproducibility and validity by comparing the intakes of 27 nutrients between the two FFQs and the first FFQ (FFQ1) and WDRs, respectively. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (SRs) between estimates from the FFQs and WDRs were calculated and corrected for intra-individual variation in the WDRs. Intakes of the selected nutrients estimated from the two FFQs were equivalent. The median energy-adjusted SRs between FFQ1 and the second FFQ were 0.66 for both men and women. Regarding validity adjusted for within-individual variation, energy-adjusted SRs for WDRs vs FFQ1 ranged from 0.13 (thiamin) to 0.79 (alcohol) for men, and the median was 0.35. The energy-adjusted SRs ranged from 0.20 (protein) to 0.71 (alcohol) for women, and the median was 0.43. The FFQ demonstrated high reproducibility and moderate validity, which suggests that it is appropriate to clarify associations between diet and health and/or disease among adults in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.