Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40765806›Full record

ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2025

Reproducibility and validity of a food frequency questionnaire for nutrient intakes in the study areas of large-scale cohort studies in Japan.

Chiho Goto, Nahomi Imaeda, Kenji Wakai, Tae Sasakabe, Nobuaki Michihata, Isao Oze, Akihiro Hosono, Mako Nagayoshi, Naoko Miyagawa, Etsuko Ozaki and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A polymorphism in theNagoya journal of medical science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Chiho GotoDepartment of Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Human Life, Nagoya Bunri University, Inazawa, Japan.
Nahomi ImaedaDepartment of Public Health, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Kenji WakaiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Tae SasakabeDepartment of Public Health, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan.
Nobuaki MichihataCancer Prevention Center, Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute, Chiba, Japan.
Isao OzeDivision of Cancer Information and Control, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan.
Akihiro HosonoDepartment of Public Health, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Mako NagayoshiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Naoko MiyagawaDepartment of Public Health, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.
Etsuko OzakiDepartment of Epidemiology for Community Health and Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroaki IkezakiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hinako NanriDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Rie IbusukiDepartment of Community-Based Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.
Sakurako Katsuura-KamanoDepartment of Food Nutritional Science, Tokushima Bunri University, Tokushima, Japan.
Kiyonori KurikiLaboratory of Public Health, Graduate School of Nutritional and Environmental Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yuri YaguchiInstitute of Well-Being, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan.
Ayako KuriharaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Keitaro MatsuoDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Japan Multi-Institutional Collaborative Cohort Study, the Yamagata Molecular Epidemiological Cohort Study, and the Tsuruoka Metabolomics Cohort Study use a 47-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) developed in central Japan in 2004. We applied regression analyses to estimate nutrient intakes in the FFQ. The regression equations, however, may not be so robust and may vary among areas, even in Japan. We aimed to evaluate the reproducibility and validity of the FFQ over an expanded area of Japan. Healthy volunteers aged 34-70 years from 13 areas of Japan provided 12-day weighed dietary records (WDRs) and completed two FFQs over 1 year. We evaluated reproducibility and validity by comparing the intakes of 27 nutrients between the two FFQs and the first FFQ (FFQ1) and WDRs, respectively. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (SRs) between estimates from the FFQs and WDRs were calculated and corrected for intra-individual variation in the WDRs. Intakes of the selected nutrients estimated from the two FFQs were equivalent. The median energy-adjusted SRs between FFQ1 and the second FFQ were 0.66 for both men and women. Regarding validity adjusted for within-individual variation, energy-adjusted SRs for WDRs vs FFQ1 ranged from 0.13 (thiamin) to 0.79 (alcohol) for men, and the median was 0.35. The energy-adjusted SRs ranged from 0.20 (protein) to 0.71 (alcohol) for women, and the median was 0.43. The FFQ demonstrated high reproducibility and moderate validity, which suggests that it is appropriate to clarify associations between diet and health and/or disease among adults in Japan.

Indexed as

Diet SurveysEnergy IntakeAdultAgedCohort StudiesDiet RecordsFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedNutrientsReproducibility of ResultsNutrientscorrelation coefficientfood frequency questionnairereproducibilityvalidityweighed dietary record

Identifiers

PMID40765806
PMCPMC12320297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.