ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2025
A comprehensive analysis of the acromial morphology and etiological factors for rotator cuff tears in Fosbury flop tears: bursal-sided partial-thickness tears versus full-thickness tears.
Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fosbury flop tears (FFTs) are a type of rotator cuff tear characterized by the tendon flipping upon itself and adhering medially. These tears have been observed arthroscopically as either bursal-sided partial-thickness tears (BSPTTs) or full-thickness tears (FTTs), though the mechanism leading to FFTs in these tear types remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the clinical features, acromial morphology, and treatment outcomes of FFTs, stratifying patients into BSPTT and FTT groups. We included patients with small-to-medium-sized supraspinatus tendon tears who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). Those with BSPTTs were categorized as Group P, and those with FTTs as Group F. Variables such as age, sex, diabetes mellitus status, critical shoulder angle (CSA), lateral acromial angle (LAA), sagittal and coronal acromion morphologies, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and retear rate were evaluated. Group P consisted of 13 patients, primarily younger males with traumatic tears, while Group F included 40 patients, with a higher proportion of females. There were no significant differences between the groups in CSA, LAA, JOA scores, or retear rates. Both groups had a high prevalence of double-floor type osteophytes in coronal acromial morphology. FFTs were frequently observed in both BSPTTs and FTTs, particularly in patients with double-floor osteophytes. BSPTTs with FFTs may be more common in younger patients with trauma. Overall, ARCR outcomes for FFTs were similar between BSPTTs and FTTs, suggesting similar efficacy in treatment across these tear types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.