ReviewIranian journal of public health2025
The Impact of Neuromuscular Stimulation on the Rehabilitation Outcomes of Patients Following Joint Replacement Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Iranian journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation of Gluteus Medius Muscle on Hip Function and Sleep Quality in Patients With Sleep Disorders After Hip Arthroplasty.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the impact of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on rehabilitation outcomes in patients following joint replacement surgery. Methods: The systematic review and meta-analysis performed a computerized search of six databases-PubMed, Wiley Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and PEDro-from 2009-2024, for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two independent reviewers screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias according to predefined criteria. The primary outcome measures included range of Motion (ROM), pain scores, muscle strength, and functional recovery scores. Results: Ten RCTs involving 549 participants were included in the analysis, all of which met the inclusion criteria and had a moderate to low risk of bias. NMES significantly reduced pain scores in patients following joint replacement surgery (Standardized mean differences, with high heterogeneity (I Conclusion: NMES is an effective adjunctive therapy for improving joint range of motion, reducing pain, and enhancing functional recovery after joint replacement surgery, but further high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.