ReviewQatar medical journal2025
Failure rate and complications of small-bore, wire-guided chest drains in adult patients presenting with traumatic and nontraumatic pleural diseases: A systematic review.
Review in Qatar medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-Fluoroscopy Versus Ultrasound Guidance for Catheter Drainage of Loculated Pleural Effusions: A Retrospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pleural diseases are common and often require drainage, with the growing use of small-bore chest drains (SBCDs) instead of larger tubes. This review aimed to examine the failure rate and complications associated with SBCD use in different pleural pathologies. Methods: A literature search (PubMed, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar) was performed on the complications associated with SBCDs to treat pleural diseases. This review analyzed patient demographics, indications, outcomes, failure rate, and complications associated with the use of SBCDs. The systematic review was conducted using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Results: Thirty studies were included in this review with 4,973 patients. The indications for insertions of SBCDs were pleural effusion at 48.4%, pneumothorax at 30.1%, empyema or parapneumonic effusion at 11.4%, hemothorax at 6.5%, and other indications at 3.6%. The overall failure rate to achieve satisfactory drainage was 19.4%. Significant complications included iatrogenic pneumothorax at 11.9%, major hemorrhage at 1.0%, local bleeding at 0.7%, infection at 1.2%, and iatrogenic organ injury at 0.9%. Other insertional complications included tube dislodgement at 5.9%, tube blockage at 5.4%, tube kinking at 3.7%, misplacement at 3.3%, and subcutaneous hematoma at 0.5%. Most of the data published revolves around hemodynamically stable patients with SBCD insertions and is, thus, deficient regarding hemodynamically unstable patients. Conclusion: Despite carrying notable failure rates and complications, small-bore catheters remain an acceptable option for managing selected pleural diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.