ArticleNAM journal2025
Complement-ARIE: Catalyzing the Development and Adoption of New Approach Methodologies.
Article in NAM journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systems biology framework for the rational design of operational conditions for in vitro/in vivo translation of tissue models.Science advances · 2026Article
- New approach methodologies in neurotherapeutics development.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Review
- Review
- AI-driven nanomedicine for cancer theranostics.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Need for NAMs: A systematic evidence synthesis revealing over half a century of drug development failure.NAM journal · 2026Article
- The ethical and social significance of NAM terminology and definitions.NAM journal · 2026Article
- Independent testing infrastructure for new approach methodologies: the UC Davis NAMs testing center.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Article
- A sociological perspective on the challenges of displacing animal research within academia: the contribution of Bourdieu.NAM journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
New approach methodologies (NAMs) are proving to be invaluable tools in basic and clinical research to better understand human health and disease, elucidate mechanisms, and study the efficacy and toxicity of novel therapeutics that can improve upon and complement animal-based methodologies. Over the last 15 years, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has increased investment in NAMs, including in chemico, in silico, and in vitro approaches, such as cell-free assay systems, digital twins, and microphysiological systems (MPS). To further catalyze and innovate the use of NAMs, the NIH Common Fund has initiated a new program, Complement Animal Research In Experimentation (Complement-ARIE), which aims to pioneer the development, standardization, validation, and regulatory use of combinatorial NAMs that will more accurately model human biology and disease states. This program specifically aims to 1) better model human health and disease differences in outcomes across populations, 2) develop NAMs that can provide insights into specific biological processes or disease states, 3) validate mature NAMs to support regulatory use and standardization, and 4) complement traditional animal models to make research more efficient and effective. To inform the implementation of Complement-ARIE, the NIH organized strategic planning activities including an inter-agency retreat, public listening sessions, scientific literature landscape analysis, and a challenge prize. Here we discuss the goals and findings of these activities, and how these results helped identify and address scientific and operational opportunities and roadblocks for implementation of the program towards broader acceptance and impact of NAMs. We anticipate these new methods and approaches could transform the way we do basic, translational, and clinical sciences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.