ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
The Immunologic Spectrum of Biostimulators and Its Clinical Importance.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Monopolar Radiofrequency for Dermal Prejuvenation: Scientific Rationale and Mechanisms of Action.Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2026Review
- Bio-OssFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Integrative Aesthetics: Shaping the Emerging Frontier of Modern Aesthetic Medicine.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Biostimulators have become important tools in aesthetic medicine to address age-related volume loss and tissue changes. They stimulate the body's natural processes to produce collagen and other components that contribute to a youthful appearance. Understanding the immunologic mechanisms underlying these processes is crucial for achieving optimal clinical outcomes. We thus sought to review the immunologic mechanisms underlying the action of biostimulators and their implications in clinical practice in aesthetic medicine. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to examine the diverse immunologic mechanisms triggered by commonly used biostimulators, including poly-l-lactic acid, polycaprolactone, and calcium hydroxylapatite, with a particular focus on their physicochemical properties and clinical effects. Results: Biostimulators elicit variable wound-healing immune responses based on their physicochemical properties. Injecting a biomaterial recognized immunologically as nonself will follow a foreign body pathway, producing outcomes that can vary from those of an immunologically familiar biomaterial. The extent of tissue regeneration is influenced primarily by the injected biomaterial's physicochemical properties, and particle size and shape. Other factors (eg, injection technique and contamination) can also influence outcomes. Biostimulator choice depends on specific clinical goals and patient characteristics. All of these factors require consideration when formulating treatment strategies for tissue regeneration. Conclusions: Biostimulators elicit a spectrum of immunologic responses dependent on their physicochemical properties, ultimately producing clinical outcomes tending toward replacement or regeneration of native tissue. Understanding their immunologic mechanisms allows for optimal selection and use to achieve desired outcomes. Further research is needed to elucidate the complex immune responses to different biostimulators.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.