ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2025
Psychometric properties and cross-cultural adaptation of the Japanese version of the Affective Reactivity Index: A community-based study of adolescent irritability.
Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing Irritability in Primary School-Aged Children: How to Test and Whom to Ask.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Psychometric properties and cross-cultural adaptation of the Japanese version of the Affective Reactivity Index: A community-based study of adolescent irritability.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Self-reported scales that adequately measure tonic irritability and provide international comparability are lacking in Japan. Therefore, the present study aimed to examine the reliability, validity, and cross-cultural adaptation of both self- and parent-reported versions of the Japanese version of the Affective Reactivity Index. Methods: We used 2019 data from the Hirosaki City School Cohort Study, which is a part of the Assessment of Preschool to Adolescence-Longitudinal Epidemiological Study. To evaluate the construct validity of the Affective Reactivity Index, we examined the association between depressive symptoms and emotional and conduct problems. We applied item response theory to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Affective Reactivity Index and assess various latent traits. Results: Our findings confirmed the reliability and construct validity of both the self- and parent-reported versions of the Affective Reactivity Index ( Conclusion: This study comprehensively examined the reliability, validity, and cross-cultural adaptation of the Japanese version of the Affective Reactivity Index for both self- and parent-reports. These findings mark a crucial step in developing culturally adapted tools for assessing irritability in Japanese adolescents, contributing to both research and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.