Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40765674›Full record

ReviewClinics in colon and rectal surgery2025

Technical Considerations for Oncologic Colectomy.

Philip S Bauer, Jordan Wlodarczyk, Maria Widmar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Philip S BauerColorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jordan WlodarczykColorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Maria WidmarColorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colectomy for malignant tumors or unresectable benign tumors requires preoperative planning based on cross-sectional imaging, consideration of neoadjuvant therapy, a decision on the extent of lymphadenectomy, and comprehensive knowledge of the relevant anatomy. Imaging review is critical for determining resectability and noting any aberrant anatomy. Based on the imaging, neoadjuvant therapy should be considered for bulky or locally advanced disease. The anatomical resection of the colon, mesentery, and lymph node basins is performed in accordance with the concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME), entailing the resection of the mesentery with visceral peritoneum intact, appropriate proximal and distal margins taken en bloc, and high ligation of the primary feeding vessels along which the lymph nodes are positioned. High ligation of the colic arteries is part of a standard lymphadenectomy and is intended to address possible micrometastatic nodal disease and proper staging for adjuvant therapy. Extended lymphadenectomy in the form of CME with central vascular ligation is indicated for patients with advanced T stage or clinical lymphadenopathy. Whether extended lymphadenectomy should be performed routinely is subject to debate. In this article, we review the indications and operative strategies for management of colon cancer in various locations in the colon, as well as key considerations for minimally invasive colectomy and advanced techniques such as CME with central vascular ligation.

Indexed as

colectomycolon cancercomplete mesocolic excision

Identifiers

PMID40765674
PMCPMC12321370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.