Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40765671›Full record

ReviewClinics in colon and rectal surgery2025

Defining and Achieving High-Quality Colon Cancer Surgery.

Arden M Morris, Cindy J Kin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arden M MorrisDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Cindy J KinDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There have been extensive efforts to improve the quality of colon cancer surgery to reduce variation in practice and improve outcomes. Providing the most appropriate care begins with following guidelines for preoperative diagnostics and staging, which should lead to risk stratification, high-quality counselling, and even prehabilitation before an operation. Intraoperatively, adherence to standardized surgical protocols can enhance delivery of high-quality care, and documenting using synoptic formats can reduce ambiguity. Participating in programs that track data and provide feedback can further allow hospitals and surgeons to identify patterns and opportunities to improve the care they deliver.

Indexed as

appropriatenesscolon cancer surgeryenhanced recoveryquality improvementsynoptic operative report

Identifiers

PMID40765671
PMCPMC12321366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.