Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40765670›Full record

ReviewClinics in colon and rectal surgery2025

Measuring What Matters: Patient-Reported Outcomes in Colon Cancer Care.

Claire M Sokas, Srinivas Joga Ivatury

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Claire M SokasDepartment of Surgery and Perioperative Care, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas.
Srinivas Joga IvaturyDepartment of Surgery and Perioperative Care, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients have common and personalized questions about expected outcomes after colon cancer treatment. Surgeons and oncologists can use high-quality clinical counseling and patient-reported outcomes to identify what matters most to each patient. This article reviews common patient-centered outcomes and how to elicit personalized outcomes, preferences, and values for patients facing colon cancer.

Indexed as

colon cancerpatient-reported outcomesshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID40765670
PMCPMC12321371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.