ArticleJBMR plus2025
Surgical periosteal resection changes bone geometry and strength in New Zealand white rabbits.
Article in JBMR plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple pediatric neuromuscular conditions can result in thin and gracile long bone formation with increased risk of pathologic fracture. Following previous observations, we sought to characterize structural changes after periosteal resection to determine its potential as a novel strategy to increase bone diameter and strength as an adjunct to prevent pathologic fractures. Fifty-three 7-wk-old New Zealand white rabbits underwent unilateral proximal tibial periosteal resection. Assessments up to 8 wk following the procedure included growth rates, growth plate thickness, periosteal collagen alignment, micro-CT trabecular patterns, BMD and BMC, shape modeling, and mechanical testing to failure. We found differential growth acceleration at the proximal and distal tibia over the study period. Physeal thickness decreased with age; however, the reserve/proliferative zone increased during the periods of accelerated growth. At 8 wk postoperative, juxta-physeal trabecular structural model index was greater, indicating a more rod-like trabecular architecture, while distal tibial diaphysis demonstrated increased cortical porosity in the experimental limbs. Tibial length and mid-point circumference were greater in the experimental limbs, indicating they were larger, and 2D BMD and BMC were also increased in these tibiae. Statistical shape analysis demonstrated that the operative tibiae had more procurvatum (proximal bend) than the shams, presumably from the effect of accelerated tibial growth in the presence of an intact fibula. These 3D changes in shape and increased cortical porosity likely explain why the experimental tibia was weaker in torsion than the shams despite being geometrically larger with greater mineral content. This study demonstrates that localized perturbation in the proximal periosteum can alter multiple characteristics within the bone, leading to changes throughout its entire structure. While the increased geometric size, bone density, and mineral content were encouraging for the translational purposes of this work, the inferior mechanical properties, limit its potential as a bone strengthening adjunct without additional study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.