Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40765592›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

The Impact of Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Volatile Anesthetics on Minimizing Cancer Recurrence and Postoperative Cognition.

Issac H Jin, Michael W Lew

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Issac H JinAnesthesiology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
Michael W LewAnesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the incidence of cancer and the number of annual oncologic surgeries continue to rise, especially among younger populations, there is increasing interest in how perioperative factors, including the choice of anesthetic agent, may influence long-term oncologic survival outcomes and postoperative cognitive recovery. While surgery remains a mainstay component of treatment for solid organ malignancies, the physiological stress and inflammatory response triggered during the perioperative period may play a meaningful role in tumor progression, recurrence, and metastasis. Given these concerns and the potential benefit of selective anesthesia, the choice of anesthetic agent has gained increased attention for its potential to impact patient care, recovery, and outcomes beyond perioperative management, including postoperative delirium (POD) and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). In addition to providing adequate intraoperative sedation, propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and inhaled volatile agents have been studied with the intent of characterizing their oncologic impact, which has yielded mixed results, making it difficult to conclude that one agent is superior to the other. Limitations in trial design, cancer heterogeneity, and confounding perioperative factors, such as agent administration timing and adjunctive sedation, underscore the need for larger-scale, multicenter randomized trials with long-term follow-up periods to better characterize the impact of anesthetic agents. Until more definitive evidence emerges, anesthetic choice should be individualized based on individual comorbidities, cognitive risk factors, surgical context, and anesthesiologist familiarity.

Indexed as

cancer recurrenceonco anesthesiapostoperative cognitive dysfunctionpostoperative deliriumsevoflurane vs propofol

Identifiers

PMID40765592
PMCPMC12324421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.