ArticleJournal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures)2025
Angioedema: Is ICU admission warranted? A single institution assessment.
Article in Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Angioedema has potential for rapid airway decompensation requiring intervention. Patients are often admitted to an ICU for "airway watch." There is a lack of evidence to support which patients require this. Aim: We aimed to characterize admission patterns and outcomes of angioedema patients at our institution to assess resource utilization and necessity of ICU use. We hypothesized that patients not requiring intubation upon presentation are safe to manage outside the ICU. Materials and Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients admitted to our urban academic quaternary referral institution with angioedema ICD-10 codes between 2017 and 2020. Charts reviewed for demographics, etiology, admission location, level of care, length of stay (LOS), intubation information, discharge destination, and specific treatment administered. Statistical analysis included a t-test for continuous variables (LOS). Results: Of 135 encounters for angioedema, 117 patients were admitted. 50 were admitted to an ICU. Patients were evenly split based on sex, majority black, and the most common etiology was ACE-inhibitor use. 20 required airway intervention with intubations primarily outside the ICU setting and only 2 in the ICU. 1 surgical airway performed in the ED. The mean time from presentation to intubation was 2.7 hours (Min 0h; Max 7.5h). The average ICU LOS for non-intubated patients was 1.1 days, with hospital LOS 1.5 days compared to 0.25 days for those not admitted to an ICU (p<0.001). For intubated patients, average ICU LOS was 4.3 days, with hospital LOS 6.2 days. All intubated patients were successfully liberated from the ventilator. No deaths occurred. Conclusion: Most angioedema encounters did not require airway intervention within the first hours of presentation. Airway decompensation and intervention mostly occurred prior to the ICU setting. ICU resources should be carefully allocated and may be unnecessary for patients presenting with angioedema who are not intubated on initial evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.