Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40765468›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution2025

Evolution of Duplicated Hox Gene Clusters in Land Snails and Slugs.

Finn McHale, Peter O Mulhair, Peter W H Holland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Finn McHaleDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8413-5388
Peter O MulhairInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3311-4883
Peter W H HollandDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1533-9376

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Terrestrial slugs and snails, order Stylommatophora, underwent a genome duplication in their ancestry. This affords an opportunity to examine how Hox gene clusters evolved after duplication in an invertebrate group and compare to the well-studied genome duplications of vertebrates. Using genomic data and PCR verification, we describe Hox gene organization for 10 species of Stylommatophora and one close relative. All Stylommatophora sampled have two broken Hox gene clusters. The HoxA cluster is dispersed along one chromosome and generally has 9 genes, but only 8 genes in slugs. The HoxB cluster is dispersed along a different chromosome and usually has 7 genes, but only 6 genes in giant African land snails. No cluster has a full complement of 11 genes. The patchwork retention of duplicated Hox genes shows striking similarities to duplicated vertebrate Hox gene clusters.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGastropodaGene DuplicationGenes, HomeoboxMultigene FamilySnailsAnimalsPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID40765468
PMCPMC12328838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.