Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40765444›Full record

ArticleGlia2025

Glia Preserve Their Own Functions While Compensating for Neighboring Glial Cell Dysfunction.

Allison N Beachum, Gabriela Salazar, Amelia Nachbar, Kevin Krause, Hannah Klose, Kate Meyer, Ariana Maserejian, Grace Ross, Hannah Boyd, Thaddeus Weigel and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Glia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Allison N BeachumDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7384-6136
Gabriela SalazarDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8557-8079
Amelia NachbarDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Kevin KrauseDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Hannah KloseDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Kate MeyerDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Ariana MaserejianDepartment of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
Grace RossDepartment of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
Hannah BoydDepartment of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
Thaddeus WeigelDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1698-3438
Lydia AmbayeDepartment of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
Hayes MillerDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Hannah GroteDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Jaeda Coutinho-BuddDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7055-5701

Funding

Mechanisms of Glial Interactions and Function at Neuronal Cell BodiesR01NS121101 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI COUTINHO-BUDD, JAEDA · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
NIH HHS R01NS121101NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS121101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glial cells are essential for nervous system development, homeostasis, and disease response, engaging in close interactions with neurons and other glial cells to carry out their functions. A large focus of glial studies has been on investigating how these cells work with neurons to execute their supportive roles, yet glial-glial interactions are even less well understood. Our previous work established that the loss of the secreted neurotrophin, Spätzle 3 (Spz3), from Drosophila cortex glia (CG) results in the morphological degradation of CG during mid to late larval development, where they lose their intricate interactions with neurons and other glial subtypes. Building on this work, we found that the loss of CG-neuron interactions triggers aberrant infiltration and functional compensation from all neighboring glial cell types-astrocytes, ensheathing glia (EG), and subperineurial glia (SPG)-and that both the CG disruption and surrounding aberrant glial extensions are inhibited by blocking CNS growth. These aberrant glial processes are able to compensate for at least one major CG function, the clearance of apoptotic neuronal corpses via Draper-mediated engulfment. Remarkably, even as astrocytes, EG, and SPG divert their cellular resources to extend into new territories and take on new functions, they continue to maintain their normal homeostatic roles such as synaptic remodeling (astrocytes), post-injury clearance of neurite debris (ensheathing glia), and regulation of the blood-brain barrier (SPG). These findings reveal that multiple glial subtypes can dynamically respond to nearby glial dysfunction to preserve CNS homeostasis, highlighting the resilience and adaptability of glia across subtypes.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationNeurogliaAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsLarvaNeuronsDrosophila Proteinsastrocytescortex gliadrosophilaengulfmentensheathing gliafunctional compensationglial‐glial interactionsglial tilingneuronal deathsubperineurial glia

Identifiers

PMID40765444
PMCPMC12541895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.