ArticleMacromolecular bioscience2025
Novel High-Efficient Method to Generate Fragmented Nano- and Microfibers Enabling an Additive for Bio-Inks.
Article in Macromolecular bioscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Novel High-Efficient Method to Generate Fragmented Nano- and Microfibers Enabling an Additive for Bio-Inks.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As an emerging technology, biofabrication combines biopolymers and living cells to create functional tissues, allowing the development of structures that closely mimic native tissues. The use of fiber-reinforced materials is of particular interest, as it enhances both mechanical properties and cellular behavior. Incorporating fiber fragments into bio-inks not only strengthens printed structures but also supports cell survival by lowering polymer concentrations and thus the stress exerted on the cells during printing. A key factor in optimizing fiber-reinforced bio-inks is the controlled fiber shortening, comprising cutting or breaking, which improves printability and mechanical integrity of printed constructs. However, current methods for fiber fragmentation face significant limitations, including material-specific dependencies, scalability challenges, and requirements of specialized equipment, which may not be accessible in all laboratories. To overcome these challenges, we introduce a novel approach utilizing ultraviolet irradiation to achieve controlled fiber fragmentation. The average fiber length resulting from specific irradiation times can be estimated using a multi-modal Weibull analysis. This technique is validated on fibers made of polycaprolactone (PCL) and gelatin blends, demonstrating its cost-effectiveness, biocompatibility, and simplicity. This study provides a practical solution for fiber fragment production and average length estimation, offering an accessible and scalable alternative for fiber-based biofabrication applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.