ArticleJournal of food science2025
Sugar Estimation as an Alternative and Rapid Approach to Predicting Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) in Produce Wash Water.
Article in Journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring chemical oxygen demand (COD) during washing of fresh produce is critical to maintaining the antimicrobial efficacy of sanitizers. However, traditional COD analysis is time-consuming (2-3 h) and costly. Since sugars released from fresh produce contribute to the overall COD, we investigated whether sugar estimation using the colorimetric sulfuric acid-UV spectrometry method (SA-UV method) can be a rapid, low-cost, and field-deployable method to predict the COD. The method relies on measurement of furfurals (absorbance at 315 nm, A
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.