ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Cochlear Implantation Benefits for Patients with Trauma-Induced Bilateral Hearing Loss: A Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accidental or intentional head trauma can result in degrees of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), but if the cochlear nerve is intact, cochlear implantation is the main option to restore hearing. This retrospective study evaluated outcomes from cochlear implantation in 9 patients with bilateral severe SNHL after major head trauma. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 9 patients who lost their hearing (deep hearing impairment) due to major head trauma and were qualified for cochlear implantation. Before surgery, each patient underwent tonal and speech audiometry in free field, using a fitted hearing aid. To assess the benefits of cochlear implants, tests were repeated 12 months after surgery, with speech audiometry conducted in quiet and noisy conditions using an active cochlear implant. RESULTS The patients exhibited various consequences of major head trauma, such as fractures of various skull bones and brain tissue damage. All participants showed significant improvement in speech understanding with the active cochlear implant. Before surgery, the average speech audiometry score with hearing aids was 1.6%, which increased to 61.7% in a quiet environment and 32% in a noisy environment after surgery. CONCLUSIONS Cochlear implants give the ability to hear and understand speech to patients who have injuries from major head trauma. The complexity and multifaceted nature of head injury highlights the need for further research and the development of therapeutic methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.