ArticleThe Australasian journal of dermatology2025
Criteria for Commencing and Continuing Subsidised Janus Kinase Inhibitor Therapy in Australian Alopecia Areata Patients-Results From an Australian Expert Consensus Exercise.
Article in The Australasian journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Adults and Adolescents with Alopecia Areata: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesJanus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) have been approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration for severe alopecia areata (AA) in Australia. However, access is limited as JAKis are not currently subsidised on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for this indication. This study aimed to establish expert consensus on criteria for initiating and continuing subsidised JAKi therapy for AA.
methodsAn eDelphi study was conducted with 26 Australian specialists in hair and scalp disorders, who participated in two online survey rounds. A third round, held as a virtual meeting, facilitated discussion. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement or disagreement.
resultsTwenty-six, twenty-two, and twenty-five experts completed the first, second, and third rounds, respectively. Experts agreed that JAKis were nearly always the best treatment for cases with ≥ 50% scalp hair loss and usually the best treatment for 21%-49% scalp hair loss. The most important additional factors when assessing eligibility for JAKis were refractory disease, rapid progression, psychosocial morbidity, poorly camouflaged hair loss, ophiasis pattern, and impaired quality of life. Treatment failure was defined as < 50% improvement in scalp hair loss after 12 months of therapy. Indicators of remission included achieving SALT 0, regrowth of facial hair, improved DLQI scores, patient satisfaction, negative hair pull test, and reduced psychosocial impairment.
conclusionsThis expert consensus provides a framework for determining eligibility for subsidised JAKi therapy in Australian AA patients. Future research, supported by patient registries, should incorporate patient perspectives to further refine these criteria, ensure equitable access to treatment, and assess real-world impact, safety, and effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.