ArticleJournal of veterinary science2025
Blood pressure agreement between ideal and loose-fitting cuffs in anesthetized dogs.
Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceIndirect blood pressure monitoring is used frequently in veterinary medicine. Blood pressure cuff looseness has not been investigated as a cause of erroneous measurements.
objectiveTo determine if cuff looseness affects blood pressure measurements in healthy anesthetized dogs.
methodsBetween December 2020 and May 2022 at an institutional practice, 62 anesthetized healthy dogs were separated into two groups: ≤ 20 kg and > 20 kg. Tail base circumference of each dog was measured, and baseline was defined as ideal (0% looseness factor). The cuff was manually loosened sequentially from 0% to 2%, 5%, 8%, 10% and 15% looseness factors. High definition oscillometry was used to measure systolic (SAP), mean (MAP) and diastolic (DAP) arterial blood pressures. Bland and Altman for repeated measures was used to analyze SAP, MAP and DAP measurements of baseline and each looseness factor. Acceptable bias and limits of agreement (LoA) were set using American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine guidelines.
resultsAll biases were acceptable. In dogs ≤ 20 kg, LoA for all SAP looseness factors and MAP looseness factors of 10% and 15% did not fall within the guidelines. In dogs > 20 kg, LoA for all measurements except SAP 5%, 8% and 10% looseness factors fell within the guidelines. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Loosening a cuff up to 15% did not result in significant changes to blood pressure measurements of healthy anesthetized dogs using high definition oscillometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.