Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40765125›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2025

Colorectal cancer screening barriers, facilitators, and promotion recommendations by Alaska Native people who are non-adherent to colorectal cancer screening.

Diana Redwood, Melissa Toffolon, Christie Flanagan, Lauren Jeffries, Danika Bailie, Lila Finney Rutten, John Kisiel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Diana RedwoodAlaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
Melissa ToffolonActionable Data Consulting, Wasilla, Alaska, USA.
Christie FlanaganAlaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
Lauren JeffriesAlaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
Danika BailieYukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation, Bethel, Alaska, USA.
Lila Finney RuttenMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
John KisielMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Randomized controlled trial of the stool DNA test to improve colorectal cancer screening among Alaska Native peopleR01CA247642 · NCI · ALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM · PI REDWOOD, DIANA · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA247642NIH HHS 5R01CA247642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe examined barriers and facilitators to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among Alaska Native individuals who had never been screened or were not up to date with screening guidelines.

methodsAs part of a larger study investigating the use of the multitarget stool DNA test in rural Alaska communities, we conducted focus groups and in-depth interviews with 28 never screened or not up-to-date Alaska Native people in two remote communities between November 2022 and July 2023. Participants shared their barriers to CRC screening and offered suggestions to improve programs to better reach those who are guideline discordant.

findingsGeneral screening barriers included lack of knowledge, fear of discovering you have cancer, and cultural health beliefs. Colonoscopy-specific barriers included embarrassment from knowing the local medical staff, having rectal area viewed or touched, fear of pain and injury, difficulty scheduling a procedure due to traditional food gathering activities, lack of provider referrals/reminders, and the high cost of air travel required to get to a colonoscopy facility. Stool DNA-specific concerns included not feeling that it was as good as colonoscopy, lack of privacy to do the test, and hesitancy collecting stool samples. Suggestions for increasing screening rates included increasing access via paid air transportation, using local indigenous languages, improving provider relationships and reminder systems, and providing CRC and screening education using trusted messengers.

conclusionsThis was the first exploration of the perceptions of CRC screening among guideline discordant Alaska Native people. Identified themes can be used to improve screening program outreach effectiveness in the future.

Indexed as

Alaska NativesColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMass ScreeningAdultAgedAlaskaFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRural PopulationAlaska Nativecolorectal neoplasmsearly detection of cancerhealth promotionqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID40765125
PMCPMC13281725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.