ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025
Ultrasound and MRI Correlations with Pathological Findings in Fibrolipomatous Hamartoma of Peripheral Nerves.
Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and pathology with Fibrolipomatous Hamartoma (FLH) of the peripheral nerve.
methodsSixteen patients who underwent surgical treatment for FLH of the peripheral nerve were included in the study. Ultrasound examination and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) were used to display the detailed anatomical structure of the region well enough to detect FLH. The features presented based on the results of ultrasound examination and magnetic resonance imaging were recorded.
resultsThe involved peripheral nerve showed expansive growth in ultrasonography and MRI. The hyperechoic fat tissue and hypoechoic nerve fibers alternated with one another. In ultrasonography and MRI, the peripheral nerve exhibited a lotus-like appearance in the transverse plane, and a cable-like appearance in the longitudinal plane, while there was no blood flow signal in the nerve. DISCUSSION: The imaging features of FLH, including the characteristic lotus-like and cable-like appearances, align closely with pathological findings, underscoring the diagnostic value of ultrasonography and MRI. These non-invasive techniques facilitate differentiation from other peripheral nerve pathologies, such as carpal tunnel syndrome or hemangioma. Limitations include the retrospective design, small MRI subgroup, and lack of longterm follow-up. Future multicenter studies with larger cohorts are recommended to validate these findings.
conclusionUltrasonography and MRI may be valuable in the diagnosis of FLH of the peripheral nerve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.