ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025
Evaluation of emergency medical responses to nursing homes in a local area of Germany.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emergency Medical Service Responses for Older Adults: A Retrospective Observational Study Comparing Nursing Homes and the Community.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn rural areas with low population density, emergency medical services (EMS) are often the first source of acute medical care in nursing homes (NHs) when nursing staff are unable to manage the situation, and no specialist practitioner is immediately available. This study analysed EMS responses to NHs in a German region to evaluate their frequency, causes, and outcomes.
methodsThis cross-sectional study analysed EMS responses to NHs in a German region from July 2020 to December 2024. Prehospital patient care was assessed using the ABCDE approach, with additional analysis of feedback codes transmitted to the control centre. Data were presented through descriptive statistics.
resultsAmong 81,727 EMS responses, 55,900 were acute emergencies, including 5,738 cases to NHs. The median age of NH patients was 84 years (IQR 78–89), with 41% male and 59% female. Spontaneous breathing was unremarkable in 72% (4,141/5,738) of cases. A pulse rate of 60–100 beats per minute was recorded in 71% (4,093/5,738), and systolic blood pressure ranged between 100 and 140 mmHg in 45% (2,572/5,738). Neurologically, 80% (4,570/5,738) were classified as ‘alert’, and 12% (674/5,738) as ‘responsive to speech’. The most common diagnoses included fractures (face, head, extremities) and pneumonia. In 81.6% of cases, disturbances in all vital signs were classified as ‘low’ to ‘moderate’.
conclusionMost EMS responses to NHs involved patients with stable vital signs, and critically acute conditions were rare. Hospital admissions were predominantly ‘non-urgent’, with patients mainly transferred to primary care hospitals, which typically offer basic medical services, suggesting lower medical complexity. Falls and related injuries, particularly suspected hip fractures, were the leading reason for EMS utilisation. These findings highlight the need for targeted strategies to enhance the management of ‘non-urgent’ cases within NHs and to reduce avoidable hospital admissions, which may partly result from limited access to medical support.
trial registrationThis study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register on 17 December 2024 (ID DRKS00035675).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.