ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Determination of redundant scan coverages along the Z-axis and dose implications for common paediatric computed tomography imaging examinations in a limited resource setting.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the Landscape of Over-Scanning in CT Imaging: A Scoping Review.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Review
- Contemporary strategies for dose optimization in pediatric congenital heart disease CT: size-specific acquisition and detector-level advances.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Review
- Microvascular Imaging of Hepatic Hemangiomas.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOptimizing scan parameters, particularly along the Z-axis, is crucial for minimizing unnecessary medical radiation exposure. Understanding and mitigating redundant scan coverages is essential for enhancing the safety and efficacy of paediatric CT imaging. This study quantified redundant Z-axis scan coverage and evaluated its associated dose implications in paediatric CT examinations in a limited-resource healthcare setting.
methodsA retrospective review was conducted on 279 paediatric CT scan records from two large tertiary hospitals in Ghana. Distances above the upper target and below the lower target of selected anatomical regions were measured using calibrated callipers on the CT console. The National Cancer Institute Dosimetry System for Computed Tomography (Monte Carlo-based software) was used to simulate the scanning situations and organ-dose implications.
resultsIn all, 87.3% of the CT scans had redundancies ranging from 0.77 ± 0.42 to 2.34 ± 1.22 cm for head, 1.43 ± 2.36 to 5.64 ± 3.00 cm for chest and 4.86 ± 3.01 to 6.75 ± 4.28 cm for abdominopelvic CT scans. Optimizing the scan length to the appropriate anatomical boundaries reduced the total dose-length product of neonates and middle-aged children by 27.9% and 26.1% respectively for chest CT scans, and 26.2% for infants during abdominopelvic CT scans. Optimal scan length selection for chest CT examinations resulted in organ-dose reductions of 57.5%, 56.1%, 63.6% and 73.8% for the thyroid glands, heart wall, lungs and breasts respectively.
conclusionThe study demonstrates a high prevalence (87.3%) of redundant scan coverage in paediatric CT examinations, with significant variances across different body sites. Implementing optimized scan lengths could substantially reduce radiation exposure and significantly lower organ doses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.