ArticleBMC nursing2025
A mixed methods study exploring barriers and facilitators to secondary-care nurses discussing smoking cessation with patients: phase 1 of the Think Quit Study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nurse Specialising Consultation in Heart Failure: Impact on Drug Titration and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTobacco smokers have increased hospital admissions and experience more health complications compared to those who do not smoke. As such, admission to hospital presents an opportunity for intervention. Nurses play a fundamental role in health promotion, and are well positioned to implement and deliver smoking cessation interventions, but barriers exist. The present study aimed to systematically identify barriers and facilitators experienced by nurses when undertaking two target behaviours; (1) discussing smoking with patients and (2) referring them to smoking cessation services.
methodsA convergent mixed methods study was conducted with secondary care nurses in a University Health Board in South Wales. Informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the COM-B model of behaviour, data were collected using a self-administered anonymised survey and a series of focus groups and interviews that explored experiences of nurses and determinants of the target behaviours. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse survey responses and explore relationships between nurse characteristics and behavioural determinants. Deductive framework analysis was used to code qualitative data to TDF domains.
resultsSurvey responses were received from 110 nurses working across 13 speciality areas. Nurse respondents perceived the target behaviours to be very important, and reported frequently undertaking the target behaviours. From the TDF, skills, social influences, environmental context and resources and reinforcement domains had the lowest scores, indicating greater perceived barriers in these areas. Twenty-one nurses participated in focus groups (n = 5) and interviews (n = 2). Factors influencing the target behaviours were identified for 10 of 14 TDF domains. Facilitators included seeing these behaviours as consistent with their role and utilising the presence of prompts in the environment, whilst barriers included lack of and inconsistent referral methods, competing priorities and patient resistance.
conclusionsNurses recognise the importance of their role to discuss smoking but have limited knowledge of local smoking cessation services and experience barriers in their workspace. Reducing barriers to discussing smoking and referring patients will facilitate nurses to support their patients to achieve the best health outcomes through quitting smoking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.