Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40764943›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2025

Prevalence and antibiotic resistance profiles of ESKAPE pathogens in the neonatal intensive care unit of the women and newborn hospital in Lusaka, Zambia.

Sharon Namukonda, Misheck Shawa, Amon Siame, James Mwansa, Gina Mulundu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Genomic analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. ScymicrosinFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sharon NamukondaDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia. sharonnamukonda@gmail.com.
Misheck ShawaHokudai Centre for Zoonosis Control in Zambia, Hokkaido University, Lusaka, Zambia.
Amon SiameDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
James MwansaLusaka Apex Medical University, Lusaka, Zambia.
Gina MulunduDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBacterial contamination of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) poses a significant risk for cross-transmission, potentially leading to infections in vulnerable neonates. Key pathogens involved in NICU-acquired infections such as Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp. are collectively known as ESKAPE pathogens. They are known for their antibiotic resistance, posing challenges for treatment. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and antibiotic resistance profiles of ESKAPE pathogens in the NICU at the Women and Newborn Hospital (WNH).

methodsA total of 344 Samples were collected from different medical equipment, inanimate, animate surfaces and indoor air using standard microbiological methods. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was then performed using the Kirby-Bauer method.

resultsBacterial contamination rate was 323/344 (93.9%), with 83/323 (25.7%) of samples containing ESKAPE pathogens. Antimicrobial susceptibility varied among ESKAPE pathogens with a total of 75/83 (90%) of the ESKAPE isolates being multi-drug resistant (MDR). Gram-negative isolates exhibited high resistance to β-lactams, carbapenems, and fluoroquinolones, with susceptibility to aminoglycosides, while Gram-positive isolates showed resistance to β-lactams and macrolides but remained largely susceptible to linezolid, clindamycin, and vancomycin.

conclusionThere was a high level of contamination with MDR ESKAPE pathogens in the NICU. This highlights the need for improved infection prevention and control measures as well as antimicrobial stewardship to prevent further resistance.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCross InfectionDrug Resistance, BacterialIntensive Care Units, NeonatalAcinetobacter baumanniiDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFemaleGram-Negative BacteriaHumansInfant, NewbornMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPrevalenceZambiaAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic resistanceContaminationESKAPENeonatal Intensive Care UnitPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID40764943
PMCPMC12326871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.