ArticleStem cell research & therapy2025
Repair of infarcted myocardium by skeletal muscle-derived mesenchymal stromal cells delivered by a bioprinted collagen patch.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of stem cells in the precise diagnosis and treatment of liver diseases.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- 3D Bioprinting Functional Engineered Heart Tissues.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Restoration of skeletal muscle function via mesenchymal stem cells: mechanistic insights and therapeutic advances in myasthenia gravis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) are commonly investigated for post-infarction cardiac repair because of their angiogenic, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. However, autologous sources (bone marrow and adipose tissue) require substantially invasive harvest procedures while allogeneic MSC from the cord raise the issue of batch to batch variability. This study assessed the effects of another under-investigated cell source: the skeletal muscle whose autologous MSC feature the clinically appealing advantage of being retrievable by a minimally invasive microbiopsy. MSC differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) were selected as controls as they also look clinically attractive because of their high scalability and high degree of reproducibility. In vitro, muscle-derived (md) MSC exhibited typical MSC features including a tri-lineage differentiation potential and had robust angiogenic, anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic and immune-modulatory effects. Overall, they outperformed iPSC-MSC which raised a safety concern linked to the persistence of some pluripotency-associated markers. They were thus chosen for the subsequent in vivo evaluation in a rat model of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction induced by ischemia/reperfusion. To this end, mdMSC were embedded in a collagen bioprinted gel; the resulting epicardially-delivered patch significantly improved LV ejection fraction compared to a cell-free patch and sham-operated controls. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that this benefit was accompanied by a downregulation of fibrosis-, apoptosis-, and inflammation-related genes. This exploratory proof-of-concept study thus suggests that mdMSC offer an attractive alternative because they combine an autologous origin with a minimally invasive harvest procedure. Bioprinting these cells with a collagen bioink allows to generate a patch endowed with cardio-reparative properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.