Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40764877›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Serial processing of stimulus identity and shift readiness predictions.

Anthony W Sali, Emily E Oor

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anthony W SaliDepartment of Psychology, Wake Forest University, 1834 Wake Forest Road, Winston-Salem, NC, 27109, USA. saliaw@wfu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2297-7923
Emily E OorDepartment of Psychology, Wake Forest University, 1834 Wake Forest Road, Winston-Salem, NC, 27109, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As an individual's goals change, they must flexibly shift the focus of attention. In real-world scenarios, multiple stimuli, each with different likelihoods, can signal that it is appropriate to shift or to hold attention on a moment-by-moment basis. In the current study, we independently manipulated the likelihood of shifting attention and the likelihood of receiving particular cue stimuli by presenting multiple shift- and hold-attention cues to dissociate the behavioral costs associated with violations of shift readiness from stimulus identity predictions. After excluding trials with exact cue stimulus repetitions-where response times were significantly shorter than for other trials-we observed additive updating costs for shift and stimulus identity likelihood prediction errors across two experiments. Together, our results suggest that when cue stimuli do not consecutively repeat, the processes of updating attention-shifting readiness and stimulus identity are best explained by a serial processing architecture. The data, materials, and analysis code for this experiment are available online ( https://osf.io/zdtvc/ ).

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalAttentionCuesExecutive FunctionPattern Recognition, VisualPsychomotor PerformanceAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultAttention and executive controlAttention: space-basedCognitive and attentional control

Identifiers

PMID40764877
PMCPMC12568794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.