ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
Towards a zero-shot low-latency navigation for open surgery augmented reality applications.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-contained intraoperative surface acquisition on a mixed-reality headset: a comparison of sensor-based and learning-based reconstruction.Research square · 2026Article
- Real-Time Markerless Tooth Detection Towards Dynamic Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Navigation.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAugmented reality (AR) enhances surgical navigation by superimposing visible anatomical structures with three-dimensional virtual models using head-mounted displays (HMDs). In particular, interventions such as open liver surgery can benefit from AR navigation, as it aids in identifying and distinguishing tumors and risk structures. However, there is a lack of automatic and markerless methods that are robust against real-world challenges, such as partial occlusion and organ motion.
methodsWe introduce a novel multi-device approach for automatic live navigation in open liver surgery that enhances the visualization and interaction capabilities of a HoloLens 2 HMD through precise and reliable registration using an Intel RealSense RGB-D camera. The intraoperative RGB-D segmentation and the preoperative CT data are utilized to register a virtual liver model to the target anatomy. An AR-prompted Segment Anything Model (SAM) enables robust segmentation of the liver in situ without the need for additional training data. To mitigate algorithmic latency, Double Exponential Smoothing (DES) is applied to forecast registration results.
resultsWe conducted a phantom study for open liver surgery, investigating various scenarios of liver motion, viewpoints, and occlusion. The mean registration errors (8.31 mm-18.78 mm TRE) are comparable to those reported in prior work, while our approach demonstrates high success rates even for high occlusion factors and strong motion. Using forecasting, we bypassed the algorithmic latency of 79.8 ms per frame, with median forecasting errors below 2 mms and 1.5 degrees between the quaternions.
conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first work to approach markerless in situ visualization by combining a multi-device method with forecasting and a foundation model for segmentation and tracking. This enables a more reliable and precise AR registration of surgical targets with low latency. Our approach can be applied to other surgical applications and AR hardware with minimal effort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.