Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40764870›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025

[Choice architecture in institutional food services: strategies to promote sustainable nutrition].

Julia Meis-Harris, Simone Dohle

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julia Meis-HarrisForschungslabor für Gesundheits- und Risikokommunikation, Venusberg-Campus 1, Institut für Hausarztmedizin, Gebäude 05, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. Julia.Meis-Harris@ukbonn.de.
Simone DohleForschungslabor für Gesundheits- und Risikokommunikation, Venusberg-Campus 1, Institut für Hausarztmedizin, Gebäude 05, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Institutional food services in Germany play a crucial role in the daily nutrition of millions of people and therefore have a substantial impact on both health and sustainability. This narrative review examines the opportunities and challenges of choice architecture to promote sustainable eating habits within institutional food services. The focus is on three types of interventions that are relatively easy to implement in this context: 1) default interventions, where an option is set as the standard; 2) availability interventions, where the range of offerings is controlled; and 3) recommendations in the form of labels or logos.We present current research findings demonstrating how these interventions can encourage positive dietary choices while maintaining consumers' freedom of choice. Strategies such as establishing a meat-free default menu or increasing the availability of vegetarian dishes show promising results, whereas the effectiveness of eco-labels varies depending on the catering context.Our conclusion emphasizes the need for further practical research and highlights the importance of an integrated approach that involves all relevant stakeholders in the change process. Through a balanced combination of these measures, decision-makers can make a significant contribution to the development of sustainable and future-oriented institutional food services.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDiet, HealthyFood ServicesHealth PromotionFood LabelingFood PreferencesGermanyHumansBehaviour changeInstitutional food servicesInterventionsMenu designNudging

Identifiers

PMID40764870
PMCPMC12391169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.