ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025
[Choice architecture in institutional food services: strategies to promote sustainable nutrition].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Institutional food services in Germany play a crucial role in the daily nutrition of millions of people and therefore have a substantial impact on both health and sustainability. This narrative review examines the opportunities and challenges of choice architecture to promote sustainable eating habits within institutional food services. The focus is on three types of interventions that are relatively easy to implement in this context: 1) default interventions, where an option is set as the standard; 2) availability interventions, where the range of offerings is controlled; and 3) recommendations in the form of labels or logos.We present current research findings demonstrating how these interventions can encourage positive dietary choices while maintaining consumers' freedom of choice. Strategies such as establishing a meat-free default menu or increasing the availability of vegetarian dishes show promising results, whereas the effectiveness of eco-labels varies depending on the catering context.Our conclusion emphasizes the need for further practical research and highlights the importance of an integrated approach that involves all relevant stakeholders in the change process. Through a balanced combination of these measures, decision-makers can make a significant contribution to the development of sustainable and future-oriented institutional food services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.